
Originally Posted by
Robert5988
There have been literally hundreds of posts on this subjecton on OV and other forums and still no conclusion. The problem is a conflict between US regulations and the guidance notes of the US Embassy in UK. This is the question on ESTA
The US Regulations for entry state that you must declare an offence of moral turpitude and are ineligible to travel on a Visa Waiver. However there is no precise definition of moral turpitude in US law, but the regulations give plenty of examples of offences that are, and are not, included in that category, and DUI(Americaneese! for drinkdriving) is not such an offence; indeed even a third offence of DUI is not considered an offence of moral turpitude.
I have seen an offence of moral turpitude described as involving an intent to commit an offence and thus it can be argued that someone caught DUI did not intend to commit an offence.
On the other hand the guidance from the US embassy in London clearly states that if you have been arrested you are ineligible to use a Visa Waiver - and drink driving in UK involves an arrest.
The problem is that apparently the US embassy guidance in some other countries, in the visa waiver scheme, does not include the term 'arrest'; and I have read that drink driving in some countries does not necessarily mean you are arrested. Indeed in UK you could be arrested for drink driving - and subsequently at police station be below the limit and not charged; the strict interpretation of the US embassy guidance is that you need a visa.
There is no point in phoning or writing to the US Embassy in London or indeed the US authorities. Their standard reply is that if you are unsure of the regulations you must attend for an interview.(and you will pay£1.50 a minute on the phone to get that answer)
Bookmarks